Selected TOP NEWS via RSS

January 11, 2007

Scientists create ball lightning in lab

Rock 'n Roll legend Jerry Lee Lewis immortalised them in his biggest ever hit - and now scientists have created real "Great Balls of Fire" in the lab.

The mysterious phenomenon of ball lightening has been unravelled after Brazilian researchers cooked up a simple recipe for similar eerie orbs - even getting them to bounce around for several seconds.

It is believed the stunning spectacle occurs when lightening strikes any silica present in soil and turns into pure silicon vapour.

As the vapour cools the silicon condenses into a floating aerosol bound into a ball by charges that gather on its surface - and it glows with the heat of silicon recombining with oxygen.

Using currents of up to 140 amps the researchers zapped wafers of silicon between two electrodes and created luminous orbs the size of ping-pong balls that persisted for 8 seconds - making them the longest-lived 'great balls of fire' ever made in the lab.

Thousands of people have reported seeing ball lightening - a luminous sphere that sometimes appears during thunderstorms.

It is typically the size of a grapefruit and lasts for a few seconds or minutes sometimes hovering or even bouncing along the ground.

One eyewitness saw a glowing ball burn through the screen door of a house in Oregon, navigate down to the basement and wreck an old mangle while in another report a similar orb bounced on a Russian teacher's head more than
twenty times before vanishing.

Study leader Dr Antonio Pavao, of the Federal University of Pernambuco, said: "The luminous balls seem to be
alive."

He says their fuzzy surfaces emitted little jets that seemed to jerk them forward or sideways - as well as smoke
trails that formed spiral shapes suggesting the balls were spinning.

From their blue-white or orange-white colour Dr Pavao's team estimates they have a temperature of about 2,000
Kelvin. Water boils at 373 K.

The balls were able to melt plastic - and one even burned a hole in Dr Paiva's jeans, reports New Scientist.

Earlier experiments using microwaves created luminous balls but they disappeared milliseconds after the microwaves
were switched off.

Dr Pavao, whose findings will be published in Physical Review Letters, said: "The lifetimes of our fireballs are about a hundred or more times higher than that obtained by microwaves."

Chemical engineer Professor John Abrahamson, who was the first to explain the mechanism of ball lightning in 2002, is thrilled.

Prof Abrahamson, of Canterbury University in Christchurch, New Zealand, said: "It made my year when I heard about it.

"The balls - although still small - lasted long enough to come into the mainstream of observed natural ball lightning."

Dr Pavao's team is currently working out the chemical reactions involved in the balls' formation and experimenting
with other materials that could also work including pure metals, alloys and sulphur compounds.

Lewis was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1986 for his pioneering contribution to the genre and in 2004 Rolling Stone Magazine ranked him at number 24 on their list of the 100 Greatest Artists of All Time

[+/-] show/hide this post

Source: Life Style Extra

1 comment:

Erich J. Knight said...

After seeing your Ball Lightning article, I thought these Aneutronic Fusion efforts might interest you.

Here I am not talking about the big science ITER project taking thirty years, but the several small alternative plasma fusion efforts.

.There are three companies pursuing hydrogen-boron plasma toroid fusion, Paul Koloc, Prometheus II, Eric Lerner, Focus Fusion and Clint Seward of Electron Power Systems http://www.electronpowersystems.com/ . A resent DOD review of EPS technology reads as follows:

"MIT considers these plasmas a revolutionary breakthrough, with Delphi's
chief scientist and senior manager for advanced technology both agreeing
that EST/SPT physics are repeatable and theoretically explainable. MIT and
EPS have jointly authored numerous professional papers describing their
work. (Delphi is a $33B company, the spun off Delco Division of General
Motors)."
and
"Cost: no cost data available. The complexity of reliable mini-toroid
formation and acceleration with compact, relatively low-cost equipment
remains to be determined. Yet the fact that the EPS/MIT STTR work this
technology has attracted interest from Delphi is very significant, as the
automotive electronics industry is considered to be extremely demanding of
functionality per dollar and pound (e.g., mil-spec performance at
Wal-Mart-class 'commodity' prices)."

EPS, Electron Power Systems seems the strongest and most advanced, and I love the scalability, They propose applications as varied as home power generation@ .ooo5 cents/KWhr, cars, distributed power, airplanes, space propulsion , power storage and kinetic weapons.

It also provides a theoretic base for ball lighting : Ball Lightning Explained as a Stable Plasma Toroid http://www.electronpowersystems.com/Images/Ball%20Lightning%20Explained.pdf
The theoretics are all there in peer reviewed papers. It does sound to good to be true however with names like MIT, Delphi, STTR grants, NIST grants , etc., popping up all over, I have to keep investigating.

Recent support has also come from one of the top lightning researcher in the world, Joe Dwyer at FIT, when he got his Y-ray and X-ray research published in the May issue of Scientific American,
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=1&articleID=00032CE5-13B7-1264-8F9683414B7FFE9F
Dwyer's paper:
http://www.lightning.ece.ufl.edu/PDF/Gammarays.pdf


lightning produces thermonuclear reaction

This new work By Dr.Kuzhevsky on neutrons in lightning: Russian Science News http://www.informnauka.ru/eng/2005/2005-09-13-5_65_e.htm is also supportive of Electron Power Systems fusion efforts .


Vincent Page (a technology officer at GE!!) gave a presentation at the 05 6th symposium on current trends in international fusion research , which high lights the need to fully fund three different approaches to P-B11 fusion (Below Is an excerpt).

He quotes costs and time to development of P-B11 Fusion as tens of million $, and years verses the many decades and ten Billion plus $ projected for ITER and other "Big" science efforts:


"for larger plant sizes
Time to small-scale Cost to achieve net if the small-scale
Concept Description net energy production energy concept works:
Koloc Spherical Plasma: 10 years(time frame), $25 million (cost), 80%(chance of success)
Field Reversed Configuration: 8 years $75 million 60%
(Eric Lerner)Plasma Focus: 6 years $18 million 80%"


Looks like Eric Lerner is also finding more support:

U.S., Chilean Labs to Collaborate on Testing Scientific Feasibility of Focus Fusion http://pesn.com/2006/03/18/9600250_LPP_Chilean_Nuclear_Commission/


This post is a plea to you as a science writers to craft a story covering aneutronic fusion, the P-B11 efforts, Eric's Billion degree temperatures and x-ray source project, Clint's lightning theories, and DOD review, and Paul's review by GE. The minimal cost and time frame for even the possibility of this leap forward seems criminal not to pursue. I am wondering why this technology has never been put in the public eye.

My hope is that someone, more skilled, would step up to give a shout out about these technologies. Please contact me for copies of my correspondence with the principles, interesting replies and criticisms from physics discussion forums and academic physicists who have replied to my queries.

Thanks for any help

Erich J. Knight

Livecam | St. Gallen

Livecam | St. Gallen